Home Indian Culture Ayodhya and Ram in Atharved

Ayodhya and Ram in Atharved

Ayodhya and Ram in Atharved


Ayodhya based by Manu, in Atharva Veda referred to as Metropolis of the Gods, capital of photo voltaic dynasty and Ikshvakus, Sarayu nice river in Rigveda.

Ayodhyā (Hindi: अयोध्या) is an historical metropolis of India, the previous capital of Awadh, within the present Faizabad district of Uttar Pradesh. Ayodhya is the start place of Hindu God Shri Ram, and the capital of Kosala Kingdom. This Hindu holy metropolis is described as early as within the Hindu Epics. Through the time of Gautama Buddha the town was referred to as Ayojjhā (Pali). Underneath Muslim rule, it was the seat of the governor of Awadh, and later throughout the British Raj the town was often known as Ajodhya or Ajodhia and was a part of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, it was additionally the seat of a small ‘talukdari’ state. It’s on the best financial institution of the river Sarayu, 555 km east of New Delhi. The phrase Ayodhya is Sanskrit for “to not be warred in opposition to”. Some Puranas just like the Brahmanda Purana take into account Ayodhya as one of many six holiest cities in Hinduism.

In keeping with the Ramayana, Ayodhya was based by Manu, the law-giver of the Hindus. For hundreds of years it was the capital of the descendants of the Surya dynasty, of which Lord Rama was probably the most celebrated king. Based mostly on the information, it’s mentioned to have coated an space of 250 km² (96 sq. miles), and was the capital of the Hindu kingdom of Kosala (Kaushal), the courtroom of the nice king Dasaratha, the 63rd monarch of the Photo voltaic line. The opening chapters of the Ramayana recount the magnificence of the town, the glories of the monarch and the virtues, wealth and loyalty of his individuals. Dasaratha was the daddy of Rama, the seventh avatar of the Vishnu. It’s right here that Shri Rama was born.

Ayodhya throughout historical instances was often known as Kosaldesa. The Atharvaveda describes it as “a metropolis constructed by Gods and being as affluent as paradise itself”.

The illustrious ruling dynasty of this area have been the Ikshvakus of the Suryavamsha (photo voltaic clan). In keeping with custom, Ikshvaku was the eldest son of Vaivasvata Manu, who established himself at Ayodhya. The earth is alleged to have its title ‘Prithivi’ from Prithu, the 6th king of the road. A couple of generations later got here Mandhatri, in whose line the 31st king was Harischandra, identified broadly for his love of Fact. Raja Sagar of the identical line carried out the Asvamedha Yajna and his nice grandson Bhagiratha is reputed to have introduced Ganga on earth by advantage of his penances.

Later within the time this clan got here to be referred to as as Raghuvamsha. Bhagirath’s Grandson was Raja Dasaratha, the illustrious father of Lord Rama, with whom the glory of the Kosala dynasty reached its peak. The story of this epic has been immortalized by Valmiki and immensely popularized by the nice lots by means of centuries. In keeping with puranic custom, within the 93rd era from Ikshvaku, the 30th from Rama was Brihabdala the final well-known king of the Ikshvaku dynasty of Ayodhya, who was killed throughout the Mahabharata struggle.

अष्टचक्रा नवद्वारा देवानां पूरयोध्या |
तस्यां हिरण्ययं: कोश: स्वर्गो ज्योतिषाsवृत: || A.V 10.2.31 ||

Eight-wheeled ,9 doored , is the impregnable stronghold of the gods;in that could be a golden vessel,heven going (swargaha),coated with gentle. – (Creator William Dwight Whitney)

The Atharva-Veda Sukta 10.2 is called Brahma Prakashan Sukta additionally it is referred to as as Kena sukta as a result of it’s much like Kena-Upanishad and it begins with the elemental query ” By whom ? “

On this sukta varied philosophical questions concerning the human physique its specialities, characterstics, Gunas, nature of the universe and its sustenance are curiously raised The mantras you quoted within the query are about “Fantastic construction of man” i.e they’re speaking about how the human construction or physique. And that physique is a lot highly effective that it’s effectively succesful to withstand any and all exterior unfavorable influences, forces that are obstacles in our understanding our self in addition to the character of the universe i.e reaching moksha and turn out to be one with brahman.

Some articles argue that Atharvaveda described Ayodhya as the town of Dasharatha talked about in Ramayana and different scriptures. However this isn’t the case the phrase Ayodhya is utilized in completely different context all through Atharva-Veda.

In keeping with students, comparable to B. B. Lal, the phrase Ayodhya on this context isn’t a correct noun (the title of a metropolis), however an adjective, which means “impregnable”] The verse describes the human physique (pur) as having eight chakras and 9 orifices – (web page 47) of his PDF.

Tulsidas is alleged to have begun the writing of his well-known Ramayana poem Shri Ramacharitamanas in Ayodhya in 1574 CE. A number of Tamil Alwar point out the town of Ayodhya. Ayodhya can also be mentioned to be the birthplace of King Bharata (The First Chakravarti King), Bhahubali, Brahmi, Sundari, King Dasaratha, Acharya Padaliptasurisvarji, King HarishchandraShri Rama Achalbhrata, and the ninth Gandhara of Mahavir Swami.

Ayodhya can also be the start place of 5 Tirthankars, together with the primary Tirthankar of Jainism, Shri Rishabh Dev. He is called the daddy of Jain faith. The town can also be vital within the historical past and heritage of Buddhism in India, with a number of Buddhist temples, monuments and facilities of studying having been established right here throughout the age of the Mauryan Empire and the Gupta Dynasty. Ayodhya reached its superb peak as identified to historical past throughout the reign of the Guptas over India.

The Thai kingdom and metropolis of Ayutthaya, and the Indonesian sultanate of Yogyakarta, have been named after Ayodhya, reflecting the frequent Southeast Asian observe of adopting place names from Hindu kingdoms.

In keeping with an eleventh century Korean chronicle the Samguk Yusa, the spouse of King Suro of the traditional Korean kingdom of Geumgwan Gaya was a princess who traveled by boat from a faraway land referred to as Ayuta to Korea in 48 CE. It’s generally thought that Ayodhya is the international land referred to within the Korean chronicles, however some students consider that the international land could have been Ayutthaya of Thailand. The Koreans know the princess as Heo Hwang-ok, who was the primary queen of Geumgwan Gaya and is taken into account an ancestor by a number of Korean lineages.

Hindu custom and scriptures states that, this place & different locations in Ayodhya have been found, excavated & rebuilt by the king Vikramaaditya because it was throughout the tenure of Lord Rama. It’s mentioned that Lord Rama appeared in king Vikramaditya’s goals & confirmed him the very highly effective & affluent metropolis of Ayodhya with all its glory & richness throughout his instances. He then instructed the king to rebuild the town of Ayodhya because it was. King Vikramaditya expressed his incapacity to rebuild such a powerful metropolis once more with all its riches however promised to rebuild this metropolis as per his talents. He then, as per the lords directions, carried out massive scale archeological excavations, at completely different places in Ayodhya & reinstalled the temples & different locations of significance in Ayodhya. The town of Ayodhya holds immense historic & non secular significance.

Historians have recognized this place to be Saketa, a key Buddhist centre throughout the fifth century BC (it’s a broadly held perception that Buddha visited Ayodhya on a number of events) which it remained until the fifth century AD. In actual fact, Fa-hien, the Chinese language monk, saved document of a number of Buddhist monasteries that he noticed right here.

Within the seventh century AD, Xuan Zhang (Hiuen Tsang), the Chinese language monk, recorded recognizing many Hindu temples in Ayodhya. Within the epic Ramayana, the town of Ayodhya is cited because the birthplace of Lord Sri Rama, a Hindu deity who was worshipped as Lord Vishnu’s seventh incarnation. Ayodhya grew to become a well-known pilgrimage vacation spot within the 1400s when Ramananda, the Hindu mystic, established a devotional sect of Rama.

The Sixteenth century witnessed a shift in energy with Ayodhya coming below the rule of the Mughal Empire. Ayodhya was annexed in 1856 by the British rulers. Between 1857 and 1859, this place was one of many foremost facilities the place the sparks of the primary struggle of Indian Independence originated. These sparks later led to a nationwide revolt of the Indian troopers in opposition to the British East India Firm that started in Calcutta.

Amongst the ‘MOKSHDAYANI PURIS’ of the world which means “the lands of non secular bliss & liberation from the karma-bandhan” Ayodhya metropolis holds the highest spot, other than cities like varanasidwaraka & others. Ramcharitmanas & different respectable hindu scriptures like ‘Vishnu Puran’, ‘Shrimad Bhagvat Mahapuran’ & others emphasize the significance of dwelling & visiting such spiritual locations. In keeping with them these Spiritually charged cities improve the PUNYA which means “fruits of Virtuous & Righteous actions” & PAAP which means “fruits of a persons’ improper doings” of a person manifold. Subsequently individuals visiting & dwelling in such holy cities are discovered doing noble & virtuous deeds.

Vandalization by Muslim Invaders

Ayodhya, like different Indian cities, was the sufferer of pillage and sacking throughout the Ghaznavi raids and Ghori invasions. Hindu temples have been allegedly looted or destroyed. The cultural material was completely destroyed. With Muslim rulers established across the metropolis below Mohammed of Ghor, it misplaced its strategic and financial significance to Lucknow and Kanpur.

Ayodhya right this moment is a small, rustic metropolis with historical Hindu structure predominating, and with some Mughal affect. Its inhabitants is usually Hindu with a minority of Muslims, Jains and Buddhists. Nevertheless, its historical past and heritage maintain an unequivocal significance for Hindus.

The Encyclopedia Britannica quantity 1, 1985. fifteenth version, has this to say about Ayodhya:

“There are few monuments of any antiquity. Rama’s birthplace is marked by a mosque, erected by the Moghul emperor Babur in 1528 on the positioning of an earlier temple.”

Till not too long ago, a lot of the proof was literary, primarily based on accounts in chronicles, supplemented by some archaeology across the website. Even then, archaeology left little doubt concerning the existence of a earlier temple on the website at which the Babri Masjid is located. Ayodhya has drawn the eye of competent archaeologists together with a number of internationally identified consultants like B.B. Lal and S.P. Gupta. In consequence, the quantity of knowledge out there is large working into a number of volumes. A few of it has in all probability been rendered out of date by discoveries following the demolition of December 6, 1992.

Discoveries on the website I

From 1975 by means of 1980, the Archaeological Survey of India below the Directorship of Professor B.B. Lal, a former Director Basic of the Survey, undertook an in depth programme of excavation at Ayodhya, together with the very mound of the Ramajanmabhumi on which the so-called “Janmasthan Masjid” or Babri Mosque as soon as stood and was later demolished on sixth December 1992. To proceed with Gupta’s account:

At Ayodhya, Professor Lal took as many as 14 trenches at completely different locations to establish the antiquity of the positioning. It was then discovered that the historical past of the township was at the least three thousand years previous, if no more … . When seen within the gentle of 20 black stone pillars, 16 of which have been discovered re-used and standing in place as nook stones of piers for the disputed domed construction of the ‘mosque’, Prof. Lal felt that the pillar bases could have belonged to a Hindu temple constructed on archaeological ranges fashioned previous to thirteenth century AD …

On additional stratigraphic and different proof, Lal concluded that the pillar bases will need to have belonged to a Hindu temple that stood between twelfth and the Sixteenth centuries.

“He additionally discovered a door-jamb carved with Hindu icons and ornamental motifs of yakshas, yakshis, kirtimukhas, purnaghattas, double lotus flowers and many others.”

What this implies is that Lal had discovered proof for presumably two temples, one which existed earlier than the thirteenth century, and one other between the thirteenth and the Sixteenth centuries. This corresponds very effectively certainly with historical past and custom. We all know that this space was ravaged by Muslim invaders following Muhammad of Ghor’s defeat of Prithviraj Chauhan within the second battle of Tarain in 1192 AD. This was apparently rebuilt and remained in use till destroyed once more within the Sixteenth century by Babar.

Spectacular as these discoveries are, Lal had really been considerably unfortunate. He had barely missed hanging a trench containing a treasure trove of Hindu artifacts from the medieval interval. As Gupta tells us:

Prof. Lal had onerous luck at Ramajanmabhumi. His southern trenches missed an enormous pit with 40 and odd sculptures simply by 10 to 12 toes. However he did get the pillar bases of the pre-Sixteenth century demolished-temple which others didn’t get.

Excavation was resumed on July 2, 1992 by S.P. Gupta, Y.D. Sharma, Okay.M. Srivastava and different senior archaeologists. This was lower than six months earlier than the demolition (which after all nobody then knew was going to happen). Their explicit curiosity lay within the forty-odd Hindu artifacts that had been found within the pit missed by Lal. These finds had been broadly reported within the newpapers. Gupta, a former Director of the Allahabad Museum and an knowledgeable on medieval artifacts had a particular curiosity in analyzing the finds. He tells us:

The group discovered that the objects have been datable to the interval starting from the tenth by means of the twelfth century AD, i.e., the interval of the late Pratiharas and early Gahadvals. The kings of those two dynasties hailing from Kannauj had dominated over Avadh and jap Uttar Pradesh successively throughout that interval.

These objects included various amakalas, i.e., the cogged-wheel kind architectural ingredient which crown the bhumi shikharas or spires of subsidiary shrines, in addition to the highest of the spire or the principle shikhara … This can be a attribute characteristic of all north Indian temples of the early medieval interval and nobody can miss it – it’s there within the Orissa temples comparable to Konarak, within the temples of Madhya Pradesh comparable to Khajuraho and within the temples of Rajasthan comparable to Osian.

There was different proof — of cornices, pillar capitals, mouldings, door jambs with floral patterns and others — leaving little doubt concerning the existence of a tenth – twelfth century temple advanced on the website of Ayodhya. So Lal had been proper in believing there was an earlier temple – previous to the one destroyed by Babar. Extra discoveries have been made following the demolition of December 6. All these discoveries depart little doubt in any respect concerning the true image.

The invention of various Kushana interval terracotta pictures of gods and goddesses earlier made it clear, first, that on the Janmabhumi website Hindu temples have been constructed a number of instances throughout the 2000 years with the interval of solely 450 years, from 1528 to 1992, when the Muslims destroyed the temple and occupied the positioning and likewise constructed a brand new construction they referred to as ‘Janmabhumi Masjid’ in their very own document; … And eventually, the temple was destroyed someday after the thirteenth century AD, in each probability within the early Sixteenth century, as is absolutely borne out by the inscriptions of Mir Baqi discovered fastened within the disputed construction from again in time, throughout the British days as is obvious from the accounts given by Mrs. A. Beveridge in her translation of Babur-Nama revealed in 1926. (op. cit. 115)

Temporary Historical past — 1528 through 1934:

As per historians, since 1528 there have been at the least 76 armed conflicts during which over 300,000 Hindus sacrificed their lives to revive the Ram Janma Bhoomi temple. Abstract of those conflicts is as follows:

  • Babar’s reign (1528-1530) – Hindus launched 4 assaults during which 100,000 individuals have been killed.
  • Humayun’s reign (1530-1556) – Hindus launched 10 separate initiatives to regain management.
  • Akbar’s reign (1556-1605) – Hindus fought 20 battles.
  • Aurungzeb’s reign (1658-1707)- Hindus fought 30 battles. One such battle was led by Guru Gobind Singh during which Aurungzeb’s military was defeated. 4 years later, Aurungzeb once more attacked Ayodhya and regained management after killing 10,000 Hindus.
  • Sahdat Ali (1798-1814) – Hindus fought 5 battles.
  • Nasir-uddin Haidar (1814-1837) – Hindus fought 3 battles.
  • Wajid Ali Shah (1847-1857) – Hindus fought 2 battles.
  • British Rule (1912-1934) – Hindus fought 2 armed conflicts.

Hindus by no means gave up on one in every of their holiest locations. Therefore the one battle free durations have been once they have been allowed to worship contained in the disputed construction. For instance, in an effort to keep away from additional battle, throughout the latter a part of his reign Akbar allowed Hindus to construct a platform often known as ‘Ram Chabutra’, and to put in and worship pictures of Ram Parivar within the so referred to as Babri compound. This observe was later opposed by Aurungzeb which resulted in most battles for the management of the shrine throughout his reign.

In 1751 A.D. Maratha Sardar Malhar Rao Holkar after defeating the Pathans within the plains of Ganga and Yamuna, requested Nawab Safderjang handy over Ayodhya, Kashi and Prayag to the Peshwas. In a letter dated February 23, 1756, Nanasaheb Peshwa requested Sardar Scindia to annex Ayodhya and Kashi because the handover of those holy locations was already promised to Raghoba Dada by Suja- uddoula. Later in 1789 A.D. Sardar MahadJi Scindia did annex Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi, however attributable to his premature demise was not in a position to restore the temples of Ram Janma Bhoomi, Krishna Janma Bhoomi and Kashi Vishweshwar again to Hindus.

Joseph Tieffenthaler (1710 – 1785), an Austrian Jesuit priest toured Oudh (Ayodhya) area between 1766 and 1771 A.D. His account of Indian Historical past and geography was translated and revealed in French in 1786 A.D. Tieffenthaler states

“The Emperor Aurungzeb destroyed the fortress referred to as Ramkot and constructed on the similar place a Mohammedan temple with 3 domes. Others say that it has been constructed by Babar. One can see 14 columns made from black stone .. which bear carvings … Subsequently Aurungzeb, and a few say Babar destroyed the (heathen) place in an effort to stop heathens from training their ceremonies. HOWEVER THEY HAVE CONTINUED TO PRACTICE THEIR RELIGIOUS CEREMONIES IN BOTH THE PLACES (inside the three domed Babri construction and the compound), KNOWING THIS TO HAVE BEEN BIRTH PLACE OF RAMA, by going round it 3 instances and prostrating on floor”.

In keeping with the British information by Thornton (1854 A.D.) and Carnegie (1870 A.D.) until 1855 A.D. Hindus continued to worship Ram within the 3 domed construction. Through the First Conflict of Independence of 1857 the native Muslim chief Amir Ali persuaded the Muslims to lastly hand over the disputed place to Hindus and collectively combat with the British. Nevertheless the British received the Conflict of 1857 and Amir Ali and Hindu chief Baba Ram Charan Das have been publicly hanged from a tree close to the Ram Janma Bhoomi. The British subsequently put a railing wall between Babri construction and the courtyard and separated the Muslim worshipers who obtained the Babri construction and Hindus had no selection however to do puja outdoors within the courtyard.

Tulsidas write about Ram Temple destruction of Ayodhya-

Tulsi Doha Shatak

mantr upanishad brahmaanhoo bahu puraan itihaas.
javan jarae rosh bharee karee tulasee parihaas 

sikha sootr se heen karee, bal te hindoo log.
bhamaree bhagae desh te, tulasee kathin kujog //86//

baabar barbar aaike kar leenhe karavaal.
hane pachaari pachaari jan, tulasee kaal karaal 

sambat sar vasu baan nabh, greeshm rtoo anumaani.
tulasee avadhahi jad javan, anarath kiye anakhāni. //88//

raamajanam maheen mandirahin, toree maseet banae.
javahi bahu hindun hate, tulasee kinhee haay. //89//

dalyo meerabaakee avadh mandir raam samaaj.
tulasee hraday hati, traahi traahi raghuraaj. //90//

raamajanam mandir jahan, lasat avadh ke beech.
tulasee rachee maseet tahan,meerabaankee khaal neech. //91//

raamaayan gharee ghant jahan, shruti puraan upakhaan.
tulasee javan ajaan tahan, kaiyon kuraan ajaan. //92//

मंत्र उपनिषद ब्राह्मनहुँ बहु पुरान इतिहास।

जवन जराये रोष भरि, करि तुलसी परिहास॥

सिखा सूत्र से हीन करि, बल ते हिन्दू लोग।

भमरि भगाये देश ते, तुलसी कठिन कुजोग॥ 

बाबर बर्बर आइके, कर लीन्हे करवाल।

हने पचारि-पचारि जन, तुलसी काल कराल॥

सम्बत सर वसु बान नभ, ग्रीष्म ऋतु अनुमानि।

तुलसी अवधहिं जड़ जवन, अनरथ किए अनखानि॥

राम जनम महिं मंदिरहिं, तोरि मसीत बनाय।

जवहि बहु हिन्दुन हते, तुलसी कीन्ही हाय॥

दल्यो मीरबाकी अवध, मन्दिर रामसमाज।

तुलसी रोवत हृदय हति, त्राहि-त्राहि रघुराज॥

राम जनम मंदिर जहाँ, लसत अवध के बीच।

तुलसी रची मसीत तहँ, मीरबाकी खल नीच॥

रामायन घरि घन्ट जहँ, श्रुति पुरान उपखान।

तुलसी जवन अजान तहँ, कियो कुरान अजान॥

And this proof was offered within the Allahabad Excessive Court docket, together with a ton of different historic information, together with archeological proof.

Under are the precise excerpts from from the Allahabad Excessive Court docket information, superbly offered by Prashant Pandey (my because of him).

I current the main points under from his reply which you’ll learn right here:

As accepted by Allahabad Excessive Court docket)

In “Tulsi Doha Shatak”, the celebrated poet Tulsidas information in a number of verses the destruction in Samvat 1585 (i.e., 1528 CE) of a temple at Ayodhya by Mir Baqi and the development of a mosque on the similar spot. Within the following extractthe primary translation of every verse is by the Allahabad Excessive Court docket (AHC) and the second by the scholar Dr. Nityanand Misra (NM); ‘Yavanas’ refers to barbarians, that’s, within the current case, Mohammedans.” – writes Nicole Elfi Michel Danino.

Within the Quantity 4 of the Judgements, honourable Judges of the Allahabad Excessive Court docket quoted Tulsidas Ji.

AHC: Goswami Tulsidas Ji says that ‘Yavans’ (barbarians/Mohammedans) ridicule hymns, a number of Upanishads and treatises like Brahmans, Puranas, Itihas (histories) and many others. and likewise the Hindu society (orthodox faith)having religion in them. They exploit the Hindu society in numerous methods.

mantr upanishad brahmaanhoo bahu puraan itihaas.
javan jarae rosh bharee karee tulasee parihaas. //85//

NM: Tulsidas says that the Yavanas, crammed with rage, burnt many Mantras or Samhitas, Upani=adverts and even Brahma:as (components of Vedas),and Purana and Itihasa scriptures, after ridiculing them.

AHC: Goswami Tulsidas Ji says that ‘Yavans’ (barbarians/Mohammedans) ridicule hymns, a number of Upanishads and treatises like Brahmans, Puranas.


AHC: Goswami Tulsi Das says that forcible makes an attempt are being made by Muslims to expel the followers of Hinduism from their very own native place(nation), forcibly divesting them of their Shikha (lock of hair on the crown of head) and ‘Yagyopaveet’ (sacrificial thread) and inflicting them to deviate from their faith. Tulsi Das phrases this time as a tough and harrowing one.

NM: Tulsidas says that within the onerous and inappropriate age, [they, the Yavanas] forcibly made the Hindus bereft of Sikha (the hair tuft) andSutra (the sacred thread) and made them wander [as homeless people],after which they expelled them from their nation (native place).

sikha sootr se heen kari bal te hindoo log.
bhamari bhagaaye desh te tulasee kathin kujog 


AHC: Describing the barbaric assault of Babur, Goswami Ji says that he indulged in ugly genocide of the natives of that place (followers of Hinduism), utilizing sword (military).

NM: The barbaric Babar got here, with a sword in his hand, and killed individuals after repeatedly calling out to them. Tulsidas says that the time was horrible.


raamaayan ghari ghant janh, shruti puraan upakhaan.
tulasee javan ajaan tanh, kahyo kuraan azaan. //92//


AHC: Goswami Tulsi Das Ji says that numerous atrocities have been dedicated by silly ‘Yavans’ (Mohammedans) in Awadh (Ayodhya) in and across the summer season of Samvat 1585, that’s, 1528 AD (Samvat 1585- 57=1528 AD).

NM: Tulsidas says that within the Saevat 1585 (1528 AD), someday across the summer season season, the ignorant Yavanas brought on catastrophe and sorrow in Awadh (Ayodhya).

Sambata sara vasu bāna nabha grīṣma r̥̄tu anumāni.
Tulasī avadhahiṁ jaṛa javana anaratha kiyē anakhāni. //88//


AHC: Describing the assault made by ‘Yavans’, that’s, Mohammedans on Sri Ramjanambhumi temple, Tulsi Das Ji says that after various Hindus had been mercilessly killedSri Ram Janam Bhumi temple was damaged to make it a mosque. Trying on the ruthless killing of Hindus,Tulsi Ji says that his coronary heart felt aggrieved, that’s, it started to weep, and on account of incident it continues to writhe in ache.

NM: Destroying the temple at Rama janmabhumi, they constructed a mosque. Without delay (or with nice readiness/alacrity) they killed many Hindus. [On thinking of this,] Tulsidas cried out – Alas!

raam janam mahi mandarahin, tori maseet banaay.
javahin bahut hindoo hate, tulasee kinhee haay. //89//


AHC: Seeing the mosque constructed by Mir Baqi in Awadh, that’s,Ayodhya within the wake of demolition of Sri Ram Janam Bhumi temple preceded by the grisly killing of followers of Hinduism having religion in Rama and likewise seeing the unhealthy plight of the temple of his favoured deity Rama, the center of Tulsi started to at all times cry tearfully for Raghuraj (probably the most revered among the many scions of the Raghu Dynasty). Being aggrieved thereby, submitting himself to the need of Sri Rama, he shouted: O Ram! Save … Save…

NM: Mir Baqi destroyed the temple in Awadh (Ayodhya) and the Rama samaja (the idols Rama Pañcayatana — Rama, Sita, Bharata,Lak=ma:a, Satrughna, Hanuman). [On thinking of this,] Tulsidas cries,beating his chest, O the very best of Raghus! Defend us, shield us!

dalya meerabaakee avadh mandir raamasamaaj.
tulasee rovat hrday ati traahi traahi raghuraaj. //90//


AHC: Tulsi Das Ji says that the mosque was constructed by the depraved Mir Baqi after demolishing Sri Ram Janam Bhumi temple, located in the course of Awadh, that’s, Ayodhya.

NM: Tulsidas says that within the midst of Awadh (Ayodhya), the place the Rama Janmabhoomi temple was resplendent, there the depraved and vile Mir Baqi constructed a mosque.

raam janam mandir jahaan tahas avadh ke beech.
tulasee rachee maseet tahan meerabaakee khal neech. //91//


raamaayan ghari ghant janh, shruti puraan upakhaan.
tulasee javan ajaan tanh, kahyo kuraan azaan. //92//



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here